I came on to say exactly this! Thank you @Catherine Nietzel ! Journalists do not “condemn” or praise acts of violence. They do a deep dive into the ideology that brought about the violence. Hannity is in no way, shape or form a journalist and Fox “News” is an oxymoron.
omg the amount of interruptions from Sean made it near impossible to listen to this because I wanted to scream. You did an amazing job of staying on point and on topic!
"How can you feel joy at the assassination of an innocent fatherly man who has children?"
Taylor shows a lot of grace and integrity in calmly explaining exactly what she said and attempting to explain her reasoning, which Hannity keeps interrupting because he knows he has no answer for it.
If it were me I would have gone for the throat: "Well this guy hoarded millions of dollars off the death and suffering of lots of people, including manly fathers with children. But you don't really give a sh*t about any of that, you're just trying to own a lib."
You didn’t wobble, you didn’t cede any ground, you didn’t stutter. As he claimed, he’s been doing “this” (bullying people into giving his show sound bites that leave rational people looking like morons for his show) for 29 years, and you handled him with grace and poise. This is an excellent clip. It only made him look like a sad baby, who can’t make a point unless it exists in the margins of “factuality.”
Given the more than two millenia of philosophy on the subject, it should be clear that asking about the nature of souls is not "a simple question". Not that that was even relevant to the topic. Taylor did well, when she could get a word in.
Further, it is not a journalist’s job to make moral judgments about others’ conscience. Hannity is not a journalist so he wouldn’t understand that.
I came on to say exactly this! Thank you @Catherine Nietzel ! Journalists do not “condemn” or praise acts of violence. They do a deep dive into the ideology that brought about the violence. Hannity is in no way, shape or form a journalist and Fox “News” is an oxymoron.
omg the amount of interruptions from Sean made it near impossible to listen to this because I wanted to scream. You did an amazing job of staying on point and on topic!
"How can you feel joy at the assassination of an innocent fatherly man who has children?"
Taylor shows a lot of grace and integrity in calmly explaining exactly what she said and attempting to explain her reasoning, which Hannity keeps interrupting because he knows he has no answer for it.
If it were me I would have gone for the throat: "Well this guy hoarded millions of dollars off the death and suffering of lots of people, including manly fathers with children. But you don't really give a sh*t about any of that, you're just trying to own a lib."
Ironically, you can’t argue with idiots. Ironic because of the title of Glen Beck’s book from back in the day.
You didn’t wobble, you didn’t cede any ground, you didn’t stutter. As he claimed, he’s been doing “this” (bullying people into giving his show sound bites that leave rational people looking like morons for his show) for 29 years, and you handled him with grace and poise. This is an excellent clip. It only made him look like a sad baby, who can’t make a point unless it exists in the margins of “factuality.”
Given the more than two millenia of philosophy on the subject, it should be clear that asking about the nature of souls is not "a simple question". Not that that was even relevant to the topic. Taylor did well, when she could get a word in.
I felt joy in his death. What’s wrong with that? I wrote a response to this. https://substack.evancarroll.com/p/joy-in-death-so-what Hope you enjoy.
💪